Application and Hearing Process
- falls within the scope of the Code, and
- has the legal authority (jurisdiction) to deal with it
- the application does not relate to one of the grounds of discrimination (for example race or disability) or to an area (for example housing or employment) covered by the Code
- the events have no connection with Ontario
- the respondent is a chartered bank, airline, television or radio station, telephone company, a company that operates buses and railways that travel between provinces or is another company that is subject to federal laws.
- the human rights claim is before the courts, or the subject of a court decision
File within one yearThe Code contains time limits for making an application to the HRTO. You must file your application within one year of when the alleged discrimination happened. If you were discriminated against more than once, you must file the application within one year of the last event. HRTO can hear a late application if it is satisfied the delay occurred in good faith and it will not cause substantial harm (prejudice) to the other parties.
Getting legal adviceIf you want to make an application to the HRTO, you can ask the Human Rights Legal Support Centre (HRLSC) for help. The HRLSC is independent of the HRTO and offers free services throughout the province. You may also get help from other legal clinics, a private lawyer or a paralegal, or may choose to file an application on your own. For more information, see Getting Legal Help.
TimelinesMediation will be scheduled for about 5 months from the date the parties agree to it. If a hearing on the merits of the application is needed, it will generally be scheduled to take place within 6 months from the date the application is ready to proceed to hearing. In some cases, it can take longer to hold a mediation or hearing. Sometimes there are preliminary issues that need to be dealt with, like an incomplete application or questions about whether the tribunal has jurisdiction. In other cases, parties ask to reschedule the hearing or mediation for a later date. For details see the HRTO’s Practice Direction on Scheduling of Hearings and Mediations, Rescheduling Requests, and Requests for Adjournments
How to fileYou can file an application directly through this website using SmartForm. SmartForms are easier to complete and can be processed more quickly than other applications. SmartForm only asks the questions that you need to answer. You can also download an application form or contact us and we’ll mail you a copy. You can mail, fax or email the completed application or you can deliver it in person.
Information to include in the formThe application form asks you to identify who you believe is responsible for the alleged discrimination. This person or organization is called the respondent. There can be more than one respondent but each respondent needs to be involved in or responsible for the discrimination. You must provide a detailed description of the events that led to your claim and explain how each respondent is responsible. Carefully consider who you want to name as a respondent. Naming many individuals in addition to an organization can delay your application. The application form also asks:
- What area(s) and ground(s) of the Code do you believe were infringed?
- What do you want to have happen as a result of your application?
- Do you want to see any changes in policies or practices?
- Have you filed complaints with any other legal bodies about the discrimination?
After you fileOnce your application has been received by the HRTO you will receive a letter in the mail that includes your HRTO file number. The HRTO will review your application to determine the next steps. If the application is incomplete or more information is required, the HRTO will let you know. If the application is complete and within the HRTO’s jurisdiction, it will be sent to the respondent(s) named in the application and any others who may be affected by the application (e.g. a labour union in the case of an application filed on the grounds of employment). You can learn more about how to complete the application form in the Applicant's Guide. To file an application, visit Forms and Filing.
How to fileYou can file a SmartForm Response directly through this website. SmartForms are easier to complete and can be processed more quickly than printed forms. The SmartForm helps you complete the form quickly and accurately by asking only the questions you need to answer. If you don’t want to use the SmartForm, you can download a response form or contact us and we’ll mail you a copy. You can mail, fax or e-mail us the completed response or deliver it in person.
Questions on the formThese are some of the questions you will need to answer on the response form.
- Did the applicant tell you about the human rights concern?
- Did you investigate?
- Do you have a human rights policy?
- What is your response to what the applicant says happened and the applicant’s proposed remedy?
Incomplete responseIf the response is not complete or more information is required, the HRTO may return the response form and tell you what information is missing. You will have 20 days to provide the missing information. Once the HRTO has your completed response, it will be delivered to the applicant and any other parties. If you do not respond to the HRTO’s request to complete the response, you may be bound by the information in the incomplete form. The HRTO will not consider requests to decide preliminary objections or issues before the complete response is filed. There are the four exceptions to this rule:
- If you say the court is already dealing with the same matter
- If you say the parties have settled the claim and the applicant signed a release
- If you claim the HRTO does not have jurisdiction over the matter because it is under federal jurisdiction.
- If you say the applicant made a complaint to the Ontario Human Rights Commission about the same matter before June 30, 2008 - the date when the OHRC stopped receiving complaints under the Code
No responseIf you receive notice of the application but do not file a response, you may not be given an opportunity to participate further in the process. You would still be responsible for complying with any orders to pay compensation.
Intervening as an affected partyAffected parties, such as unions, are also given a copy of the application. If you have been given notice as an affected party you can ask to intervene (participate) in the proceeding if you believe your legal rights could be affected by the application.
Summary hearingsA summary hearing may be ordered when it appears there may be no reasonable prospect that the application or a part of the application can succeed. The summary hearing gives the applicant an opportunity to explain the allegations contained in the application. There are a number of reasons why the HRTO may decide to hold a summary hearing. Two of the most common reasons are:
- Although the applicant may believe that the conduct of the respondent(s) is connected to a Code ground such as race or disability, it is not clear from the application that there is evidence available to prove the connection. The focus of this inquiry is on the evidence the applicant has or may be able to obtain.
- The issue the applicant is raising does not appear to fall under the Code. The focus of this inquiry is on the legal basis for the applicant’s claim and whether or not there is any reasonable prospect the allegations may amount to a Code violation
Other preliminary hearingsThe HRTO may also schedule a preliminary hearing to decide other issues. For example, a preliminary hearing might be ordered when:
- it is not clear the HRTO has jurisdiction to decide the allegations or
- there is a question about whether another proceeding has already appropriately dealt with the substance of the application.
TimelinesYou and the other party will receive a Notice of Hearing which gives the date and location of the hearing. You have 21 days after the notice of hearing is sent to provide any documents that are relevant to the application with the other party. At this stage, you don’t need to send copies of these documents to the HRTO but you do need to send the HRTO a Form 23. The form confirms that you have shared the documents with the other party. No later than 45 days before your hearing, you need to do two things:
- Send the other party a list of all witnesses, a statement of each witness’ intended evidence and a list of the documents you will present at the hearing. You do not need to send the other party copies of the documents themselves if you have already provided them with a copy.
- Send the HRTO your witness list, witness statements and copies of the documents you will use at the hearing.
Case Assessment DirectionSometimes, an adjudicator will issue a Case Assessment Direction (CAD) to help the parties prepare for the hearing. For example, a CAD may remind parties about the documents they are required to disclose to each other, identify issues which the adjudicator wants the parties to be ready to deal with at the hearing and/or confirm the format of the hearing. An adjudicator could also require the parties to participate in a conference call to help prepare for the hearing and issue a CAD after the call. See also:
The role of the adjudicatorBefore the hearing begins, the adjudicator may ask the parties if they wish to try mediation/adjudication. If they agree and sign a consent, the adjudicator will work with them to resolve the dispute. Mediation/adjudication is like mediation except that if mediation is not successful the hearing will go ahead and the same adjudicator will decide the application. The adjudicator will not consider what was heard or said in the mediation when making a decision after the hearing. For details see: Rule 15: Mediation-adjudication with agreement of the parties and A Guide to Mediation at Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario. When the hearing starts, the adjudicator will describe the hearing process, identify what he or she understands to be in dispute and may ask the parties whether they can agree on any facts or issues. The adjudicator controls the hearing. Because the adjudicator must remain neutral he or she cannot provide legal advice or tell a party how best to conduct its case. It is up to the applicant and the respondent to present evidence to support their positions. The adjudicator will often ask questions during the hearing. The adjudicator considers the evidence and the parties’ arguments and writes a decision explaining the result.
The role of the parties
During the hearing, a party can question witnesses and introduce relevant documents as evidence. The parties make arguments about the facts and the law. Everyone participating in the hearing is expected to be courteous and respectful of the adjudicator and each other. See: SJTO Common Rule A7.
More information about the hearing process is available in the Guide to Preparing for a Hearing before the HRTO.
- may decide questions about how the hearing will proceed (for example, a request to remove a party or a request for an interim remedy), or
- may decide part of the application (for example, whether some of the allegations are untimely).
- after a preliminary hearing, on issues like whether the application was filed in time or the issues were dealt with in another proceeding
- after hearing the evidence and submissions of the parties.
- monetary compensation (money)
- a non-monetary award (human rights training for the respondent’s employees, building an accessible entrance)
- an order to promote future compliance with the Code, (develop human rights policies, training)
Timing of decisionIf your hearing lasted 3 days or less, you should receive your final decision within 3 months. If your hearing lasted longer than 3 days, you should receive your final decision within 6 months. These timelines start after the last hearing date or the date when written submissions were due. All of the HRTO’s decisions are published on the Canadian Legal Information Institute website. Anyone can read them at no cost.
- a party has new facts that were not available at the time of the hearing which could change the result of the HRTO’s decision
- a party did not receive notice of the hearing and was unable to participate, through no fault of the party
- the decision conflicts with the HRTO’s procedure or case law and involves a matter of general or public importance.